RUSH EXCERPT:RUBIN: "Certainly with respect to the two statutes that they listed in a search warrant application for some of the voting data several months ago that they got from the Fulton County, I believe, the clerk of court, where those records were kept. That certainly is an argument worth making and probably a very good argument, but this appears to be a grand jury subpoena in search of a crime, rather than having a criminal theory where you’re looking for evidence to support something that you already have substantiated. It’s almost as if Todd Blanche has deputized somebody from the middle district of North Carolina who does not practice law in the northern district of Georgia. I should remind you, it appears as if this particular U.S. Attorney has been deputized to helm a bunch of election related probes and then try to sort of reverse engineer a criminal prosecution theory as opposed to having a theory of laws that have already been violated. And of course, there’s the other aspect of this that Stuart and Eli have emphasized, the way in which the subpoena is written. It doesn’t just ask for the names and addresses and information of election workers. It asks for them by sort of minute categories of who worked on what particular tasks. That suggests to me that they are trying to figure out whether or not from the county data, they can find a legal violation, and then tether that to who was responsible for, for example, manning mobile voter voter stations or who worked at particular polling station x or y. that’s a very, very dangerous proposition. Chris."
FindClipsBankNewsBaseRadioBankPodBankTranscriptBankPhotoBankPrintBankClipLiveClipperNewsClipperTVClipperWebClipperRadioClipperPodClipperGifCreatorNewsMonitorCityMonitorShareUploadGifsGalleryLiveShareShowCasterAboutNewsHow-ToRSSLoginRegisterNewsListsClips
Source: Grabien Stories
