The first week of high-stakes legal dispute between Elon Musk and OpenAI concluded in a federal court in Oakland, where the world’s richest man testified over three days about his fallout with the AI firm he co-founded. The trial which involves OpenAI CEO Sam Altman, OpenAI Vice President Greg Brockman and Microsoft, alleges how OpenAI gradually shifted toward a for-profit model leaving behind its original mission of a non-profit organisation.

The Tesla CEO told the jury that OpenAI was a nonprofit organisation when it was started in 2015 benefiting humanity. He claimed that things changed when the tech firm accepted billions in investment and moved toward a for-profit structure.

Musk described the shift as a ‘bait and switch’, especially afterOpenAIreceived an investment of $10 billion from Microsoft in 2022. He argued that such investment would be made with expectations of financial returns and not as a donation. OpenAI had denied Musk’s claims highlighting that he is trying to weaken a major rival to his own AI company, xAI.

While the xAI chief tried to remain composed during the questioning, the cross examination was proven to be challenging for him. He seemed irritated at times and pushed back against what he referred to as ‘unfair’ questions.

Answering one of the questions, the Tesla CEO admitted there was no formal agreement outlining the terms of his donations to the Sam Altman-led company. He also noted that he pledged up to $1 billion but contributed about $38 million, as per Bloomberg. Musk defended the lack of paperwork by mentioning that a nonprofit structure itself should have been enough assurance.

Another major question posed to Musk was about his timeline to file the lawsuit in 2024 when he left the company theOpenAI’s boardin 2018 and had concerns as early as 2017. He responded that it took time for him to realise the extent of the shift in which OpenAI was moving. Moreover, he emphasised that the situation actually became clear after Microsoft invested heavily in OpenAI.

During the trial, the world’s richest man was confronted with his own past emails and messages. In one of 2016 messages, Musk suggested that making OpenAI a nonprofit might have been a mistake, as it may slow progress compared to rivals like DeepMind. These earlier views suggested that Musk’s current claims might not be consistent with his past opinions.

Communications between venture capitalistShivon Zilisand Musk were also examined. Musk was quite unsure about Zilis during his sworn ceremony and initially called her ‘chief of staff’. However, a day later, the billionaire knew he did not present a clear answer in court and revealed that he lives with Zilis and she is the mother of his four children. Notably, it is Zilis’ professional overlap with Musk and OpenAI that is now under fire in court.

Zilis started working with OpenAI in 2016 as an adviser. She later joined the non-profit board, where she served until 2023. During the same time, she grew closer to the Tesla CEO personally and professionally. She also worked at Tesla between 2017 and 2019 and later went on to take a senior role at Musk’s Neuralink. This is how she stayed connected with Musk’s companies and OpenAI during a critical phase.

In one of the messages, she reportedly asked Musk whether she should remain friendly with OpenAI to keep the information flowing. The xAI chief is said to have encouraged her to stay closer to OpenAI leadership and maintain connections.

Source: India Latest News, Breaking News Today, Top News Headlines | Times Now