by Cindy Harper,Reclaim The Net:
Australia’s under-16 social media ban has been in force for four months and the headline finding from a new working paper out of the University of Chicago’s Becker Friedman Institute is that around three-quarters of the teenagers it targets are ignoring it.
The paper, “Why Bans Fail: Tipping Points and Australia’s Social Media Ban,” surveyed 746 Australian teenagers between March and April 2026. Among 14- and 15-year-olds covered by the ban, only about 27% are complying. The other 73% are still using Facebook, Instagram, Snapchat, TikTok, X, YouTube, Reddit, Twitch, Threads, or Kick, the ten platforms the law designates off-limits to anyone under 16.
TRUTH LIVES on athttps://sgtreport.tv/
The Online Safety Amendment (Social Media Minimum Age) Act 2024 took effect on 10December 2025, making Australia the first country to outlaw teenage social media accounts at the federal level.
More than a dozen other countries and numerous US states are now considering versions of the same approach. The Australian model places enforcement entirely on the platforms, which face penalties of up to A$49.5 million for failing to take “reasonable steps” to keep under-16s off their services. Teenagers themselves face no legal sanction.
The teenagers know this. According to the survey, only 22% of banned teens believe they personally face any consequence for using a banned platform.
47% correctly understand that the consequences fall on the companies. Awareness of the ban is near-universal at 86%. The teens aren’t confused about what the law says. They’ve simply concluded, accurately, that the law isn’t aimed at them.
Getting around the restrictions takes minimal effort. 75% of banned teens describe circumvention as easy or very easy.
Source: SGT Report
