The global outrage over Iran’s nuclear ambitions is not about peace, stability, or morality. It is about control.
Because if this were truly about principles, the first country under scrutiny would be Israel - a state widely believed to possess nuclear weapons, yet one that refuses international inspections and faces no sanctions, no isolation and no threats of regime change. Instead, it enjoys unconditional political and military backing from the United States, to the extent that it has used the cover of the current West Asian-Iran conflict to invade Southern Lebanon and take over large swathes of its territory.
So let’s be honest: this is not a rules-based order. It is a brute power-based order.
And Iran is being told to obey rules that others openly ignore.
The deeper hypocrisy becomes clearer when one looks at history—not rhetoric, but documented fact.
In 1953, the United States and Britain jointly orchestrated the overthrow of Iran’s democratically elected Prime Minister, Mohammad Mossadegh. His “crime”? Attempting to nationalize Iran’s own oil resources, which were largely controlled by a British company. The operation—known as Operation Ajax —was not speculation; it is now openly acknowledged, including by the US’ CIA itself.
Mossadegh’s government had moved to take control of Iran’s oil wealth from foreign hands. In response, Britain imposed economic pressure and, together with the USA, engineered a covert operation involving propaganda, paid unrest, and political manipulation to remove him.
The result? A democratically chosen leader was removed, and the rule of a pro-Western monarch—the Shah Mohammad Reza Pahlavi—was cemented and supported for decades.
Clearly, this was not about defending democracy. It was about overturning it.
If one wants to understand why Iran distrusts the West today, the answer begins here: democracy was acceptable only until it interfered with oil.
Source: India Latest News, Breaking News Today, Top News Headlines | Times Now
