The Left’s Rhetoric of Violence Against Republican Presidents

With now the third serious assassination attempt against President Trump on the books, it is an important juncture to examine the intellectualgleischaltungthat encourages American society and global society to view Republican Presidents as the height of all evil. More than Kim Jong Un of North Korea, more than Vladimir Putin of Russia, more than Ayatollah Khomeini of Iran, more than Chairman Xi of China, Republican Presidents are rhetorically imbued with intrinsic evil that requires all available means of persuasion — including assassination. Since the assassination of Lincoln, the press and academic culture have worked together to create a sense of moral purpose in killing Republican presidents. On July 11, 2007, Nobel Peace Prize laureate Betty Williams gave thekeynote speechto the International Women’s Peace Conference in Dallas, Texas, and said (to laughter and applause from the audience):“I mean right now, I could kill George Bush, no problem. No, I don’t mean that. I mean — how could you nonviolently kill somebody? I would love to be able to do that.”

TRUTH LIVES on athttps://sgtreport.tv/

As a Republican President, George W. Bush was subjected to a media and academic character assassination regimen that drove his approval into the 20s before he left office in 2009. A Methodist minister, Charles Moore hated President Bush so much that he immolated himself at Grand Saline, Texas in 2014. He expressedwritten regretthat he lacked the courage to burn himself alive on the campus of SMU where George W. Bush’s Presidential library is located. In an academic study I conducted on journalistic usage of the word “kill” and its derivates within the same sentence of Presidents Bush, Obama, and Trump, I found this data:

Theseusages occurredwithin the first six months of their respective presidencies according to the Lexis-Nexis database. Republican Presidents who wereassassinated or subjected to attempted assassination include: Abraham Lincoln, James Garfield, William McKinley, Teddy Roosevelt, Gerald Ford, Ronald Reagan, George W. Bush, and Donald Trump. Ironically, the most well-known presidential assassination was certainly that of John F. Kennedy, a Democrat president killed by a sniper assassin. The rhetoric surrounding this 1963 event provides insight into the enduring anti-Republican ethic of the American public sphere. Lee Harvey Oswald almost certainly killed President Kennedy in Dallas, Texas. One of the most treasured canards of American history is a vast array of conspiracy theories that seek to exonerate Oswald in favor of LBJ,George Bush Sr., the CIA, the Mob, and so many others. Prior to killing Kennedy, Oswaldattempted to kill General Edwin Walkerin Dallas. Walker was an iconic conservative political figure in the United States. Oswald was a loyal Marxist seeking to make powerful anti-American and anti-capitalist statements of political assassination. The recent release of files about Oswald show primarily that the government was aware of Oswald’s efforts tomeet Soviet officialsin places such as Mexico City in order to gain their approval for the assassination of Kennedy. Because he was a radical Left assassin, our public intellectual culture refuses to blame him for his repeated acts of violence. On the 50th anniversary of the Kennedy assassination, the DallasMorning Newsran articles continuing to argue that the conservative Hunt family by running conservative political ads in Dallas area media criticizing President Kennedy, they created conditions ripe for encouraging Kennedy’s assassination on that fateful day in November 1963. There is no reasonable basis for that claim and quite the opposite is true with regard to Oswald’s motives that day.

Our intellectual and academic culture is dangerously creating violent pro-assassination rhetoric that is creating this cultish desire to kill President Trump. It is not only dangerous to the United States but also the Democrat Party that offers itself as the primary point of peaceful opposition to President Trump. Revered Democrat strategist James Carville recently commended his own ‘trump derangement syndrome,’: “I hate the motherf—–. And you know what? I don’t want to get rid of it [TDS]. I don’t want to get better. I want to get worse. I want to hate him more.” “I pray to God in heaven, God, reign the righteous reign of Trump Derangement Syndrome on me,” he continued. “Pray for me, Lord. I’m your vessel on this earth. Pray for the people that listen to this. We want more. We want to hate the son of a b—- so much that we can’t see straight.” Carville’s incendiary rhetoric is not unrelated to the manifesto of the most recent shooter: