Rabindranath Tagore won the Nobel. Subhas Chandra Bose shook an empire. Satyajit Ray rewrote cinema. Jagadish Chandra Bose imagined wireless communication before the world had a word for it. For the better part of two centuries, if you wanted to find where India thought, created, argued, and led — you came to Bengal.
West Bengaltoday has a per capita income 20 percent below the national average, a state debt of Rs 6,93,231.66 crore, and an economy that has grown slower than India's for a full decade, according to NITI Aayog's March 2025 State Report and the CAG's Budget Review of West Bengal 2024-25.Phase 1 of a two-phase electioncovering all 294 constituencies has been cast. Phase 2 votes on April 29. Every campaign has been jhalmuri (spicy chat) politics — tossed together fast, spiced to sting, and consumed in the moment. The jhal (fiery) of rhetoric drowns out everything. The jhol (no real substance) of real governance – thin, watery, unexamined – is what remains when the rally ends and the votes are counted.
Not one candidate, across any party, made the development gap the centre of their campaign.
That silence is not accidental. It is the one thing Bengal's political class - across every party, every era, every promise of poribartan (change) - has always agreed on.
The NITI Aayog's March 2025 report places West Bengal's real GSDP growth at an average of 4.3 per cent between 2012-13 and 2021-22, against a national average of 5.6 per cent. Held over a full decade, that is not underperformance. That is a structural condition. The state's share in national GDP has fallen from 6.8 per cent in 1990-91 to 5.8 per cent in 2021-22. In the 1960s, Bengal's per capita income was above the national average. States that Bengal once led economically have overtaken it. Nobody on any campaign stage has been asked to explain this and people challenging have not been asked how they plan to put this back on track. To every question, the answer is plain rhetoric and violence across parties and leaders.
The CAG's budget review projects the state's revenue deficit at Rs 31,951.67 crore for 2024-25. Total state debt is projected to reach Rs 8.15 lakh crore by March 2027, with growing portions of expenditure absorbed by interest payments rather than capital investment. NITI Aayog data shows Bengal's credit-deposit ratio diverging from the national benchmark by 25 percentage points. Banks are sitting on money that businesses are not borrowing, because businesses are not confident enough to invest.
Capital has been quietly voting against Bengal for thirty years. It just doesn't use a ballot box.
Bengal's industrial decline is the longest obituary in Indian state economic history — and it has more than one author.
The state's share of national industrial output stood at 9.8 per cent in 1980-81. By 1997-98, it had fallen to 5 per cent — on the Left Front's watch, through 34 years of labour militancy, policy paralysis, and capital flight. The Left's land reforms were real. Its industrial record was a slow-motion abandonment.
Then came Mamata Banerjee-led Trinamool Congress in 2011, promising reversal. Fourteen years later, the credit-deposit gap has not closed, and the industrial share has not recovered. The BJP has contested Bengal loudly across multiple cycles without producing a single costed economic programme specific to the state's deficits. Anti-incumbency is a campaign strategy, not a development plan. The Congress governed Bengal before all of them and left it structurally wounded before quietly exiting the conversation.
Source: India Latest News, Breaking News Today, Top News Headlines | Times Now