by Joseph P. Farrell,Giza Death Star:
In fact, I’m so livid about the whole thing, I’m posting this blog a dayearly, on Sunday, when it is written, rather than wait for Monday. So our next blog will be Wednesday, with this one being a day early. Why?
Because I’m just not buying it.
By now, most if not all of you know what I’m talking about. I’m talking about the alleged assassination attempt on Mr. Trump and/or members of his cabinet at the White House Correspondents’ Dinner. Why I’m not buying it I’ll get to in a moment, but before I get to that, I had hoped to do this blog about the American spying on Pope Leo XIV, or rather, on the outrage and shock being expressed in some circles that America would be spying on the Bishop of Rome. I had planned to do a review of most of the significant times that intelligence agencies and/or secret societies were attempting to manipulate the churches by spying on them and infiltrating their own operatives into their hierarchies and seminaries.
TRUTH LIVES on athttps://sgtreport.tv/
I wanted to talk about the MI-6 and Masonic manipulation of the Oecumenical Patriarchate of Constantinople, the possible infiltration of the Papacy itself in the form of Giovanni Cardinal Mastai-Ferreti, a.k.a Pius IX, the Pope who had himself (and all subsequent popes) declared infallible at the First Vatican Council in 1870, and who one cardinal in the Roman Catholic hierarchy alleged was a member of a lodge. The infiltration story was and is well known to some traditionalist Roman Catholics as the story continues to swirl around the (very) suspicious death of Albino Cardinal Luciani, Pope John-Paul I. And so on and so on. The fact of the matter is, the story is nothing new. Secular powers have been trying to manipulate events in the churches ever since Judas Iscariot was persuaded to betray Jesus Christ for a little money.
But all that, at least for the moment, must take second place to the story of the attempted assassination of…. well, it is assumed Mr. Trump, or members of his administration, at the White House Correspondents’ Dinner this last Saturday evening. So far, we have a suspect in custody, a thirty-one-year-old teacher from Loonyfornia named Cole Allen. Frankly, given the insanity that edgymakayshun in that state cranks out, I’m not surprised that there may be a whole population of Manchurian Candidates and patsies being prepped in that place by its institutions. No surprise there. Think Sirhan Sirhan here. In any case, I learned about the story almost as it was happening, as I was getting an early start reviewing emails for this week’s blogs on Saturday evening when the attempt occurred, and my email inbox was soon stuffed with emails from the Gizars letting me know the event had occurred, and asking what I thought about it. Herewith my answer, and my explanations and high octane speculations:
Why? Well, the answer to that is a bit more complicated, but let’s begin with a review of the government’s track record of trustworthiness: it lied about the assassiantion of President John Kennedy and Senator Robert F. Kennedy Sr.; it lied about the assassination of Martin Luther King; it lied about the Gulf of Tonkin incident that launched LBJ’s buildup in Vietnam; it lied and covered up the Israeli attack on the USS Liberty; it lied about the Bank of Credit and Commerce International and Nugan-Hand Bank and Franklin Bank and Savings and Loan scandals; it lied about Ruby Ridge, Waco, the Oklahoma City bombing, the first and second attacks on the World Trade Center and 9/11; it lied about weapons of mass destruction in Iraq; it lied about there being no fraud in the 2020 elections, and on and on we could and probably should go. It still has yet to give a sensible and credible version of the murder of Charlie Kirk and not the fedslop it’s been doling out. And, yes, it has given us so many different explanations for the military actions against Iran and so many moving goalposts as to what, exactly, the goal of the whole thing has been and when and how it will extricate itself from the situation, that believing anything it says, prima facie, without any skepticism whatsoever, is just not a rational thing to do. My rule of thumb is the George Carlin rule: disbelieve anything the government says first, until it proves its case beyond a reasonable doubt and to a moral certainty. And don’t hold your breath waiting for that to happen, because there are still questions about the previous assassination attempts on Mr. Trump. When you get right down to it, it even lied – majorly – about the assassination of Abraham Lincoln and who was really behind it and why (and no, it wasn’t Confederate President Jefferson Davis).
Source: SGT Report
