Blake Lively And Justin Baldoni met in federal court for a court-mandated mediation session that lasted approximately six hours, but no agreement was reached. The session was overseen by a federal magistrate judge as part of the pre-trial process.

With no settlement filed, the dispute remains active and is currently scheduled to proceed toward a jury trial in May 2026. While negotiations can legally resume at any stage, there has been no public confirmation of additional mediation sessions.

The mediation was conducted under judicial supervision, a standard step in federal civil litigation. Both parties attended alongside legal counsel in an effort to explore potential settlement terms before the case advances further.

Attorneys confirmed that no agreement was finalised at the conclusion of the talks. Neither Blake Lively nor Justin Baldoni has publicly detailed what issues prevented a resolution, and no joint statement announcing progress has been released.

In the absence of a settlement, thecase remains set for a jury trial currently scheduled for May 2026. That date will remain on the court calendar unless a formal agreement is submitted or a scheduling change is granted.

Civil disputes can still settle after mediation fails, but until a written settlement is executed and filed, litigation continues along its procedural timeline. For now, the court schedule remains intact.

Before a jury is ever seated, both legal teams may filepre-trial motionsseeking to narrow or dismiss specific claims. These motions can determine which arguments and evidence are permitted to be presented in court.

Judges often use this stage to resolve procedural disputes and clarify the legal framework of the case. The outcome of these rulings can significantly influence the scope and direction of the trial itself.

Despite the failed mediation, settlement remains legally possible at any point prior to a jury verdict. Many civil disputes resolve before trial, even after earlier negotiations collapse.

If an agreement is reached, it would typically be filed with the court and could include confidentiality provisions limiting further public disclosure. Until that occurs, however, the case remains active within the federal system.

Source: International Business Times UK