Rep. Thomas Massie (R-KY) and Rep. Lauren Boebert (R-CO) have introduced the Surveillance Accountability Act, a bill that feels like someone took the Fourth Amendment and actually meant it.
The legislation aims âto ensure that all searches that significantly impinge on the privacy or security of a person require a warrant based on probable causeâ and to create âa right of action for violations of Fourth Amendment rights.â That covers the kinds of searches federal agencies currently conduct without judicial oversight: pulling your financial records from banks, requesting your browsing history from ISPs, buying your location data from brokers, and harvesting your biometric information from surveillance cameras.
We obtained a copy of the bill for youhere.
The bill lands in the middle of a brutal Congressional fight overFISA Section 702, the surveillance authority that currentlylets the FBI search Americansâ communications.
The new legislation goes much further than the various reform bills circulating around that debate. Where theSAFE Actand theGovernment Surveillance Reform Acttarget specific loopholes in FISA, the Surveillance Accountability Act tries to close all of them at once by rewriting the baseline rule: if the government wants your data, it needs a judgeâs permission.
More:How Your Weather App Became a Surveillance Machine â and How to Escape It
The main part of the bill adds a new Section 3119 to Title 18 of the US Code with a simple default: âno search may be conducted without a warrant issued by a neutral and detached magistrate upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched and the persons or things to be seized.â
The bill defines âsearchâ broadly enough to actually matter, covering âany government-initiated act that intrudes upon an individualâs reasonable expectation of privacy,â whether through âhuman, digital, or automated means.â It explicitly lists what falls under warrant protection: âcommunications,â âassociations,â âemployment,â âsocial media usage,â âinternet usage,â âfinancial transactions,â and âtravel.â
The bill goes further, extending protection to âthe acquisition and analysis of any data, metadata, or information pertaining to a personâs digital or physical life,â including âgeolocation,â âpersonal device activity,â âbiometric identifiers,â and âbehavioral signals data.â
The government is already collecting and analyzing patterns of how you act online, and Massie and Boebertâs bill is the first piece of legislation to name it directly and bring it under warrant protection.
Source: Infowars: There's a War on For Your Mind!