Sir Keir Starmermust be the most ignorant man ever to have entered high office.
As Director of Public Prosecutions, Starmer was apparently never consulted on his office’s decision, in late 2009, not to prosecute prolific, and highly connected, paedophileJimmy Savile, despite Savile being one of the most famous figures in Britain.
Starmer claims he didn’t even know that his own Crown Prosecution Service had opened a file on Savile, a friend to the then Prince, now King, Charles. It will never be possible to confirm or dispute Starmer’s account because all the CPS files related to the case weredestroyed— under Starmer’s watch.
Again as DPP, Starmer was supposedly not informed that the CPS wasinsistingthrough 2010 and 2011 that Sweden press on with sexual assault allegations against Wikileaks founderJulian Assange, despite a lack of evidence.
Assange had deeply embarrassed the U.K. and U.S. by exposing their war crimes in Iraq and Afghanistan. Starmer’s officials again secretly destroyed the email trail between the CPS and Sweden that would likely have illuminated his role in the affair.
As Labour leader, Starmer apparently had no knowledge of thefraudulent activitiesbeing carried out by Labour Together, the shadowy think tank that brought him to power, including its covert campaign to smear journalists who tried to expose its criminal acts.
As prime minister, Starmer claims to have had no idea of the depth of the ties betweenPeter Mandelsonand serial paedophileJeffrey Epstein, even though Mandelson was the most influential figure in the Labour party backing his bid to become leader. In return, Starmer would promote Mandelson in late 2025 as ambassador to the U.S.
Starmer said this week that he was kept in the dark that Mandelson had, in fact, failed vetting by the British security services for the post of ambassador. That requires that we believe his own Foreign Office, which overruled the security services’ decision, did so without consulting with him.
This is one long trajectory of career-enhancing ignorance and incompetence. Does any of it sound even vaguely plausible?
There are lots of clues as to what might really be going on.
Source: Global Research
