In the shadowy corridors of global power, where economic leverage masquerades as diplomacy, India is caught up in a high-stakes game orchestrated by Washington. The recent ‘trade deal’ announced by USPresident Donald Trumpon 2 February 2026, which saw tariffs on Indian goods slashed from 50% to 18%, was no benevolent olive branch. It is a calculated act of coercion, dangling the prospect of economic relief in exchange for India’s capitulation on Russian oil imports. Trump boasted on Truth Social thatPrime Minister Narendra Modihad ‘agreed to stop buying Russian oil’, framing it as a victory in starving Russia’s war machine in Ukraine. However, beneath the official rhetoric lies a stark portrait of American blackmail, gradually eroding India’s sovereignty.

To read this article in the following languages, click theTranslate Websitebutton below the author’s name.

Русский, 中文, Deutsch, عربي, Hebrew, Español,Portugues,Français, Farsi, Italiano, 日本語,한국어, Türkçe, Српски. And 40 more languages.

This isn’t mere negotiation; it’s economic warfare disguised as partnership. For months, the US has used a range of tactics — public threats, hidden pressures and outright ultimatums — to force Delhi to cut its supply of cheap Russian oil. The stakes? Billions of dollars in potential losses for India’s economy, a blow to its industrial backbone and a humiliating dent to its status as an independent geopolitical player. As the dust settles on this so-called deal, one question remains: has Modi bowed to the inevitable, or is India teetering on the brink of forced surrender that could jeopardise its energy future?

The pressure mounted in earnest in 2025 when India’s imports of Russian oil surged to account for over 35% of its total crude needs, peaking at two million barrels per day by the middle of the year. Russia, offering deep discounts after its invasion of Ukraine in 2022, became India’s top supplier, saving billions on import bills and fuelling refineries optimised for its heavy, sour crude. However, Washington, determined to isolate Moscow, saw this as an insult — funding Putin’s aggression while undermining US energy exports.

Publicly, the US increased tariffs as a blunt instrument. In August 2025, Trump doubled duties on Indian goods to 50%, adding a 25% “reciprocal” tariff to an existing 25% penalty explicitly tied to Russian oil purchases. The White House officials openly declared that this was punishment for “financing Putin’s war”. By October, sanctions had been imposed on Russian giants Rosneft and Lukoil, which supply 60% of India’s oil imports, accompanied by veiled threats of secondary sanctions on Indian refiners and banks. Imports plummeted, falling from 1.8 million barrels per day (bpd) in November 2025 to 1.2 million bpd in December, and dropping further to 1.1 million bpd in early 2026.

Behind closed doors, the pressure was even more insidious. Diplomatic ultimatums were conveyed through backroom channels, including direct phone calls between Trump and Modi. During these calls, the US president repeatedly demanded that India “stop buying Russian oil” or face escalation. Washington leaned on international financial institutions and allies — think IMF nudges and EU hypocrisy — to amplify the squeeze. European nations, which were still indirectly importing Russian energy in the form of refined products, joined the chorus, thereby exposing the West’s double standards: preaching isolation to the Global South while quietly sustaining Moscow’s revenues.

And what of the ‘gesture of goodwill’? Trump’s tariff cut is conditional and embedded in an executive order that requires the US to monitor India’s oil imports. Resume purchases ‘directly or indirectly’, and the 25% penalty will be reinstated. This isn’t reciprocity; it’s blackmail, forcing India to trade its energy autonomy for temporary relief on exports worth billions.

Follow the money and the beneficiaries of this coercion become clear. The US stands to gain massively. Trump explicitly touted India switching to American and Venezuelan oil, which could potentially funnel billions into US energy firms. Since sanctions eased in 2024, Venezuela, under US influence, has offered similar heavy crude — but at a premium. Analysts estimate that this shift could increase US exports by 10–20%, while reducing Russia’s revenues by $4 billion per month if India were to exit completely. It’s a geopolitical jackpot: weakening Russia would give the US more leverage in the Ukraine talks, while locking India into dependence on Western suppliers.

For India, however, the costs would be catastrophic. Abandoning Russian oil, which is discounted by $10–12 per barrel, could increase the annual import bill by $6–11 billion — equivalent to the federal health budget. Refineries such as Nayara, which is majority-owned by Rosneft, are facing operational chaos, with higher processing costs and lower yields causing fuel prices to spike by 2%. The industry is grinding to a halt: the petrochemicals, manufacturing and transport sectors are absorbing the hit, fuelling inflation that is burdening ordinary citizens who are already struggling with the post-pandemic recovery. Daily losses could reach $3–6 million if imports were to halt abruptly. And the irony? Global oil prices spike, benefiting the very US producers who are pushing this agenda.

Source: Global Research