Meghan Markle has been accused of 'merching the kiddos'after unveilingtwo new candles named after Prince Archie and Princess Lilibetthrough her As Ever brand in the United States on Monday, hours before Britain marked what would have been Queen Elizabeth II's 100th birthday.

21 April would have marked Queen Elizabeth II's 100th birthday, with King Charles paying tribute to his 'darling Mama' and senior royals honouring her memory, while Meghan Markle unveiled new As Ever products ahead of US Mother's Day on 10 May, quickly splitting opinion online between supporters who saw a straightforward launch and critics who cast it as a snub to the Royal Family. There has been no official palace response, and the backlash remains limited to social media.

The latest As Ever launch centres ontwo scented candles tied directly to the Sussex children's birthdays.In a post on the brand's Instagram page, Meghan's team announced: 'Introducing two new candles beautifully crafted by our founder and named in honour of her children's birthdates.'

The first, No. 604, is named for Princess Lilibet's birthdate and is described as 'floral and radiant,' with notes of amber, water lily and santal. The second, No. 506, is named for Prince Archie's birthdate and is described as 'warm and grounding,' with notes of ginger, neroli and cashmere. Both are due to go on sale on 22 April as part of aMother's Day collection.

🍫Meghan is dropping new AsEver products for Mother's Day_April 22❣️ She is honoring her babies by introducing two new candles _Inspired by her kid’s birthdays.🥰🕯No. 506 inspired by Archie🫚🕯No. 604 inspired by Lili 🪷pic.twitter.com/w1EIxk1y7s

On the surface, it is the kind of sentimental branding common in celebrity lifestyle ventures, with family milestones turned into products. What intensified the reaction was the timing, with the launch landing as Britain reflected on Queen Elizabeth II's life and legacy.

On Reddit, one critic put it bluntly: 'As ever, merching the kiddos on the late Queen's 100th birthday. Utterly disgusting.' Another claimed the clash of dates was intentional rather than careless, writing: 'It is 100% about trolling the [Royal Family] on [the late Queen's] 100th birthday. She doesn't care if she sells a single candle.'

Others focused on theuse of royal titles in the branding. 'Remove the titles and let's see how she promotes her products after the titles are removed,' one commenter wrote, arguing that the references to 'Prince' and 'Princess' were central to the appeal.

For some critics, the use of Lilibet's name on the day the late Queen was being remembered felt particularly provocative. 'This is the absolute breaking point. Enough is enough,' another wrote. 'Seeing Lilibet on her As Ever BS on the Queen's birthday?!?!?!'

The response was not entirely negative. Supporters argued there was nothing inappropriate about Meghan drawing on her children for a Mother's Day release, even if the timing invited scrutiny.

Source: International Business Times UK