In a chilling disclosure that's sending shockwaves through intelligence and political circles, the Fulford Forecast Group (FFG)—a secretive analytical outfit known for its prescient geopolitical predictions—appears to have anticipated the second assassination attempt on former President Donald Trump with eerie precision. Leaked documents from Rense.com reveal that FFG's internal memo, dated just weeks before the incident, outlined a "high-probability vector" for an attack mirroring the July 2024 Butler, Pennsylvania rally shooting, including specifics on timing, location, and tactical execution.
FFG, founded by veteran investigator Benjamin Fulford, has built a reputation among alternative media circles for forecasting major events like economic collapses and covert operations years ahead. Sources close to the group claim their methodology blends open-source intelligence, insider whistleblowers, and proprietary algorithmic modeling. The memo in question warned of a "deep state escalation" post-Trump's 2024 election victory, predicting a staged "lone wolf" shooter at a high-profile MAGA event in the Midwest, complete with law enforcement lapses and media spin.
The second attempt unfolded last Saturday in Ohio during a campaign-style rally, where a gunman perched on a nearby rooftop opened fire, grazing Trump's shoulder before Secret Service agents neutralized the threat. Eyewitnesses and preliminary FBI reports echo FFG's forecast: the shooter, identified as a 32-year-old disgruntled ex-federal contractor, exploited identical security blind spots as in Butler. Bullet casings and digital footprints recovered point to online radicalization via obscure forums, aligning with FFG's prediction of engineered "manifesto" narratives to deflect from organized backing.
This marks the latest chapter in a pattern of escalating threats against Trump, from the first assassination bid that propelled his iconic fist-pump image to legal salvos and now brazen hits. Critics of the Biden-Harris administration—and now the incoming Democratic leadership—point to FFG's track record as evidence of premeditated sabotage by entrenched powers resistant to Trump's America First agenda. Past FFG hits include foreseeing the 2020 election irregularities and the COVID-19 origins debate, lending weight to claims that U.S. intelligence agencies ignored or suppressed similar warnings.
As investigations ramp up, questions swirl about why FFG's forecast, reportedly shared with select congressional contacts, never reached frontline security. Trump allies like Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene have demanded hearings, framing the incidents as cultural warfare against populist sovereignty. Whether FFG's insights prove coincidental clairvoyance or leaked high-level intel remains unclear, but their bullseye prediction underscores a fractured national security apparatus ill-equipped for the hybrid threats of the modern era.
