North Korean leader Kim Jong-un speaks to military officials while watching the test-firing of a Hwasong-11 Ra missile at an unnamed location, Sunday. Yonhap

The war in Iran has dealt a blow to South Korea on both the security and economic fronts. The economy is reeling from the fallout of the Middle East conflict, as the standoff in the Strait of Hormuz shows little sign of ending anytime soon. Meanwhile, North Korea’s anxious response to the war has created a more dangerous security environment on the Korean Peninsula.

Since the outbreak of the conflict on Feb. 28, North Korea has doubled down on efforts to make its weapons systems more lethal and accurate. On Sunday, it launched a Hwasong-11 Ra — one of the newest and most complex members of its solid-fuel ballistic missile series — from an unspecified location. This cluster munition-armed short-range ballistic missile carries dozens of smaller bomblets designed to saturate a wide area rather than strike a single target. According to the Korean Central News Agency, leader Kim Jong-un observed the test and expressed satisfaction with the weapon. It marked the fourth such launch this month and the seventh this year.

North Korea’s flurry of missile launches reflects insecurity — a form of fear-driven signaling. U.S. strikes against Iran, coupled with the capture of Venezuelan leader Nicolás Maduro, have fueled speculation about who U.S. President Donald Trump’s next target might be. At one point, Kim Jong-un’s name surfaced among the possibilities. That speculation, however, quickly met skepticism. Unlike Iran or Venezuela, North Korea possesses nuclear weapons. Striking a nuclear-armed state like North Korea carries far greater risks than attacking one that does not.

Through this show of force, Kim appears intent on sending a message: North Korea is not Iran, and any U.S. strike would come at a high cost.

The war in Iran has also accelerated North Korea’s development of tactical weapons under the banner of self-defense and deterrence. This, in turn, has heightened the security risks facing South Korea, which must now confront two major challenges — economic and strategic — at the same time.

Economically, the prolonged disruption of the Strait of Hormuz has hit South Korea’s oil-dependent economy hard. A ceasefire between the United States and Israel on one side and Iran on the other would help stabilize oil prices and global markets. However, recovery will take time, as oil-rich Gulf countries have also suffered significant damage. Iran’s strikes on regional energy infrastructure have further complicated the outlook.

South Korea has limited influence over ceasefire negotiations in the Middle East. The reopening of the Strait of Hormuz and stabilization of oil prices depend largely on developments beyond Seoul’s control. For now, the best it can do is hope for a swift resolution.

On the security front, South Korea’s options are also constrained, though not entirely absent.

North Korea’s responses to the war in Ukraine and the conflict in the Middle East reveal a notable contrast. It has supported Russia's invasion by sending troops and supplying conventional weapons, yet it has refrained from direct involvement in Iran. This restraint suggests that Pyongyang understands the costs of deeper engagement, particularly given its past military ties with Tehran.

Source: Korea Times News