Claim $10 in US Stablecoin (USA₮) free and send your first tip with Rumble Wallet. Use code NateTheLawyer10 at signup: http://wallet.rumble.com/natethelawyer Promotional funds may only be used to tip creators on Rumble and cannot be withdrawn, transferred, or cashed out. Void where prohibited. No purchase necessary. Offer available to US residents only. Offer not available in New York State. Must be 18+. Offer is available for a limited time and for the first 500 wallets activated and funded. Restrictions apply. Details and full official rules available at http://rumble.com/promoofficialrules. This is a paid advertisement for Rumble Wallet. Rumble is compensating me for this ad. ------- He was hit with a gun. Then the gun hit the ground. Seconds later, 17-year-old Kevin Cuozzo was fatally stabbed. A Syracuse grand jury declined to charge 18-year-old Israel Pam. Did it get the self-defense call right? I break down the surveillance footage, what matters under New York self-defense law, and why Kevin’s mother says the grand jury should have seen the footage of the stabbing itself. Then I compare the facts to the Karmelo Anthony case and explain why the gun changes the analysis. You’re on the grand jury. Would you have voted to bring charges? Tell me what fact would decide it for you. Paid sponsorship from Rumble Wallet Visit wallet.rumble.com/natethelawyer and use code NateTheLawyer10 when you sign up. Chapters 0:00 Syracuse grand jury declines to charge 0:35 New York’s rules on deadly force and retreat 1:23 Kevin Cuozzo’s mother challenges the decision 2:19 Rumble Wallet paid ad 3:42 Surveillance footage shows the fight and the gun dropping 5:15 Pam pulls a knife and calls 911 5:56 Replay of the struggle and the self-defense question 6:50 What sparked the confrontation 7:30 The footage Kevin’s mother says jurors should have seen 8:10 Both sides of the self-defense argument 9:42 Reasonable mistake and my take on the grand jury decision 10:06 Why the Karmelo An