More and more are feeling like the DOJ is not fully complying with the release of Epstein Files.
It’s perhaps not surprising that the DOJ is mysteriously hiding the names of people involved in Epstein’s network. While the US law states victims’ names must be protected and redacted, this does not apply to those doing the sex trafficking, or sending the torture videos or those who are involved in engaging in other illegal activity.
TRUTH LIVES on athttps://sgtreport.tv/
Yesterday, Congressman Thomas Massie and Congressman Ro Khanna went to the DOJ and spent two hours viewing what were supposed to be unredacted Epstein Files. What they ultimately found was that 70% to 80% of the files were redacted by the FBI before they even got to the DOJ. They also found that the DOJ has not necessarily been complying with their redaction tactics as per the law. Massie and Khanna suggest this may be to protect the rich and powerful involved.
“This is bringing down the British government. It may bring down the monarchy. It’s bringing down elites. What are we doing here in the U.S. to stand up to the Epstein class? We’ve got a commerce secretary who is all over the files.” – Rep. Ro Khanna
Last night, Massie took to X to educate the public about what he has found and how the DOJ has been conducting itself in the release of the files. Below is the thread.
You can see Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche is playing the typical PR game, suggesting they have nothing to hide and are complying with an honest release of files. Should we believe him?
They hid the names of Lex Wexner, a billionaire and businessman, and Sultan Ahmed Bin Sulayem, a powerful Dubai executive, when they didn’t have to. Further, we find out that Kash Patel and the FBI are perhaps in on protecting abusers. An honest mistake? Or power protecting power?
Source: SGT Report
