Candace Owens is not yet done with Erika Kirk amid their public dispute following the death of Turning Point USA founder Charlie Kirk. The conservative commentator has made public claims against Erika regarding her husband's death, and now she's going after Charlie's widow for calling herself the 'sole provider' of their family.
Apparently, Owens disagreed with Erika's perspective... whether certain terms inadvertently diminish the contributions of those who have passed away.
In the seventh episode of Candace Owen'sBride of Charliedocumentary titled 'Crazy In Love,' she challenged Erika Kirk for her use of the term 'sole provider' in relation to her children. Owens argued that using such language is inherently misleading and serves to erase the massive financial and personal foundations Charlie Kirk built for their family.
In a recent event, Erika shared how people branded her as a 'stay-at-home mum' and told her what she should do with her life. 'Now I have to be the sole provider for my children. And again, this is not a business card opportunity,' Erika said.
According to Owens, the phrase suggests that the surviving parent is now the only reason for the family's stability. She insisted that this framing 'discounts who Charlie was' and the significant resources he secured for his family's future before his death.
'Erica is completely full of it. I mean, she is septic at this point,' Owenssaid.
The 'Blackout: How Black America Can Make Its Second Escape from the Democrat Plantation' author claimed Erika was lying and admitted she was frustrated that Charlie's widow called herself a sole provider.
'It frustrates me because it, what it truly does is it discounts who Charlie was, how genius he was, how financially savvy he was,' Owens said of Erika. 'Like she's trying to relate. Like she's just like a single mom and, and try and work in a nine-to-five, uh, working at a restaurant, trying to make ends meet for her children and the father's gone.'
According to Owens, Charlie had insurance policies to provide his family with coverage in the event he was gone. She claimed that Erika 'was set to receive approximately £7.9 million ($10 million) for his work policy.' Owens also claimed that Charlie invested in real estate, set up a trust for their children, and held life insurance policies, leaving Erika financially secure.
'She also wants us to forget that parking aside, Charlie, let's actually pretend, pretend that Charlie was financially irresponsible and just, you know, was able to run this massive business, but somehow never thought about his kids or his legacy,' Owens continued.
Source: International Business Times UK
