Authored by Ed Dowd via 'Beyond the Narrative' substack,
On August 19th the Treasury announced it would increase the size of its nominal long-end liquidity support buybacks beginning September 9. The long end yields declined on the headline. Cue the usual chorus of X hot takes: stealth QE, yield-curve control lite, money printing etc.
The reality is much less bombastic...it is mostly a jawboning exercise.
The Treasury Is Not the Fed...The Treasury Cannot Create Money
Buybacks of this type are a recycling operation. You issue more bills and notes on the front end and you take some longer paper off the street. You can tidy up liquidity in off-the-run issues. You can send a signal that you would prefer the 30-year not print a fresh multi-decade highs on a Tuesday. What you cannot do is print reserves, expand the monetary base, or run a proper balance sheet policy the way the Federal Reserve can. Confusing the two is how people talk themselves into thinking a few billion of "liquidity support" is 2020 all over again.
The size tells the story. Coupon supply at the long end is still large. Doubling a buyback program that was already small relative to annual issuance is, at best, a band-aid. Markets gave it a day. Then they remembered the calendar. The signal from Bessent is not nothing but it is not as big as it seems in the broader picture.
Who is actually in charge of the long end of the yield curve? It is not the Fed. It is not Scott Bessent's operations desk. It is priced by growth expectations and inflation expectations or said differently the boom/bust cycle.
Who is in charge of that? The laws of nature and God.
« Back to The Culture War
