That’s when the Pentagon began insisting Anthropic and other AI companies allow for “all lawful use” of their technology, Michael said.Anthropic resisted that change, arguing that today’s leading AI systems “are simply not reliable enough to power fully autonomous weapons.”Its competitors — Google, OpenAI and Elon Musk’s xAI — agreed to the Pentagon’s terms, though some still have to get their infrastructure prepared for classified military work, Michael said. The other sticking point for Anthropic was not allowing any mass surveillance of Americans.“They didn’t want us to bulk-collect public information on people using their AI system,” Michael said, describing the negotiations as “interminable.”Anthropic has disputed parts of Michael’s version of the talks and emphasized that the protections it sought were narrow and not based on existing uses of Claude. The next stage of the dispute will likely happen in court.[Learn more at the AI Risk Summit at Half Moon Bay]

Anthropic resisted that change, arguing that today’s leading AI systems “are simply not reliable enough to power fully autonomous weapons.”Its competitors — Google, OpenAI and Elon Musk’s xAI — agreed to the Pentagon’s terms, though some still have to get their infrastructure prepared for classified military work, Michael said. The other sticking point for Anthropic was not allowing any mass surveillance of Americans.“They didn’t want us to bulk-collect public information on people using their AI system,” Michael said, describing the negotiations as “interminable.”Anthropic has disputed parts of Michael’s version of the talks and emphasized that the protections it sought were narrow and not based on existing uses of Claude. The next stage of the dispute will likely happen in court.[Learn more at the AI Risk Summit at Half Moon Bay]

Its competitors — Google, OpenAI and Elon Musk’s xAI — agreed to the Pentagon’s terms, though some still have to get their infrastructure prepared for classified military work, Michael said. The other sticking point for Anthropic was not allowing any mass surveillance of Americans.“They didn’t want us to bulk-collect public information on people using their AI system,” Michael said, describing the negotiations as “interminable.”Anthropic has disputed parts of Michael’s version of the talks and emphasized that the protections it sought were narrow and not based on existing uses of Claude. The next stage of the dispute will likely happen in court.[Learn more at the AI Risk Summit at Half Moon Bay]

“They didn’t want us to bulk-collect public information on people using their AI system,” Michael said, describing the negotiations as “interminable.”Anthropic has disputed parts of Michael’s version of the talks and emphasized that the protections it sought were narrow and not based on existing uses of Claude. The next stage of the dispute will likely happen in court.[Learn more at the AI Risk Summit at Half Moon Bay]

Anthropic has disputed parts of Michael’s version of the talks and emphasized that the protections it sought were narrow and not based on existing uses of Claude. The next stage of the dispute will likely happen in court.[Learn more at the AI Risk Summit at Half Moon Bay]

[Learn more at the AI Risk Summit at Half Moon Bay]

Get a candid look at the current OT threat landscape as we move past "doom and gloom" to discuss the mechanics of modern OT exposure.

Join the event where top security experts unpack the biggest software supply chain risks.

ArmorCode has named Phil Venables to its Board of Directors.

James ‘Aaron’ Bishop has been appointed as new Pentagon CISO.

Source: SecurityWeek