It really is true that the systematic deception goes all the way up to the highest levels of our government! The FBI Director and Attorney General are in on the plot!
Kash Patel and Pam Bondi have been exposed as RADICALLY INFLATING their purported tally of Epstein “victims”!
In their notorious July 6, 2025FBI/DOJ memo, which launched the ongoing political uproar we’re still very much in the midst of, these two senior government officials used deliberately vague, weasel-word language to claim that their comprehensive review of Epstein Files had confirmed “over one thousand victims” were “harmed” by Epstein.
But… what did that even mean? Why didn’t they say “sexually abused,” if that’s what they meant? Because the word “harm” could mean virtually anything. Psychic harm? Political harm? Physical harm? Metaphysical harm? Financial harm? Hallucinated harm? As we know, what the public has been led to fundamentally believe about Epstein is that he sexually abused, molested, raped, and/or “trafficked” an enormous number of vulnerable underage females. So the conspicuously vague weasel-wordage in the FBI/DOJ memo should’ve been seen as highly suspect.
They were using a “total [alleged] victim list” — “1,114 names” — that counted “victim families” as among those who were “harmed” by Epstein! WTF? Again, what the hell does that even mean? Are they saying Epstein raped the victims’ fathers and uncles? Are we including extended family here? Second-cousins?
The federal promulgation of this eye-poppingly large “victim” tally last summer caused it to be roundly trumpeted by politicians, media outlets, and untold others, who ran around claiming that we now know for certain that Epstein brutally sex-trafficked OVER ONE THOUSAND helpless children. The resulting hysteria was of course 100% expected. Here isSpeaker Mike Johnsonciting the bogus number. Here isNBC’s Kristin Welker, host ofMeet the Press, exercising laudable journalistic acumen by uncritically citing the number. Here isCongressman Ro Khannaciting an even bigger and phonier number (1,200). Here isCongresswoman Nancy Maceciting the fraudulent figure, just yesterday (February 9). I could go on.
But, but, but. Now wereallyknow the basis for this hysteria-promoting numerical assertion. And it was essentially garbage. My personal theory is that FBI and DOJ officials smuggled it into their July 2025 memo as a sleight-of-hand political tactic, in order to stem what they anticipated would be the raging backlash over the real crux of their public findings: no large-scale “trafficking” ring, no “client list,” no blackmail operation, no predicate to charge any additional high-profile third parties, etc. So they wanted to blunt the anticipated (negative) reaction by also throwing out some weasel-word assertions about Epstein that would seem to underscore the magnitude of his purported crimes, as well as underscore the government’s profound revulsion to those purported crimes. In hopes that it wouldn’t just look like they were totally absolving Epstein.
But it was the worst of both worlds: while dispelling the core thrust of Epstein Mythology, they were also putting out a brand new, sensational claim that didn’t even make sense — and onlyintensifiedthe very backlash they were trying to blunt. Because if there really were THAT many “victims,” how could Epstein (and Maxwell) have done it all alone? Surely there must be countless more uncharged co-conspirators! IT’S GOTTA BE A COVER-UP! These big-brained FBI/DOJ political geniuses directly fueled the speculative fire — with a bunch of pure claptrap, it turns out — and now here we are today.
Source: Michael Tracey