On the scrubby edge of Tucson, where the streetlights thin out and the desert starts to look like open cover, the Nancy Guthrie case keeps refusing to settle into a single, clean storyline. Now it has another one, thecartel theory, offered not by police but by a private investigator who says the abduction looks like a 'money-making' venture tied to southern Arizona's trafficking corridors.

Nancy Guthrie is 84 and the mother ofTodayco-anchor Savannah Guthrie. She was last seen at her Tucson home on Jan. 31 and was reported missing on Feb. 1, with authorities believing she was kidnapped. The public has also seen images of a masked person in a ski mask and backpack at her door, footage released by investigators earlier this month.​

Bill Garcia, a California private investigator, toldBorder Reporthe believes Guthrie was abducted in a 'money-making venture by people involved with a cartel,' and he argued that 'that particular area of Arizona is a high drug and money transporting area.' Garcia's view is not that she was necessarily whisked into Mexico, but that she could still be somewhere in Arizona, a detail that reads like a reality check inside a dramatic claim.​

He pointed to geography more than mystery. Garcia said heavy law enforcement presence between Tucson and the border makes a quick cross-border move less likely, and he suggested a 'hundred-to-130-mile' zone north of Tucson toward the outskirts of Phoenix and Mesa as a place he would look if the goal was to hide rather than flee.​

It is an arresting theory, and it is also, at this stage, just that.The New York Postreport summarizing Garcia's comments says authorities have not officially supported the cartel idea. Anyone treating it as confirmed is getting ahead of the facts, and in a case this fevered, that's how misinformation starts to feel like evidence.

Law enforcement has been more careful than the chatter. Pima County Sheriff Chris Nanos has said there is no evidence Guthrie was taken across the U.S. Mexico border, even while acknowledging investigators recognize Mexico as a possibility and are checking leads. That distinction matters, because 'no evidence' is not the same as 'impossible,' and both are different from the internet's favorite word, 'definitely.'​

At the federal level, as perCBS News, law enforcement sources said theFBI has been in touch with the Mexican government and Mexican law enforcementregarding Guthrie's disappearance. That kind of contact does not prove she is in Mexico, but it does show investigators are treating the border as a live line of inquiry rather than a rumor to laugh off.​

Then there is themotive problem, the part that keeps investigators, and the public, circling. According toPeople Magazine, Nanos has weighed possibilities like money and revenge, asking in frustration whether it is 'money' or 'revenge for something,' while emphasizing detectives are still trying to understand why she was taken.​

The cartel theory also comes with its own rebuttal, and it is worth hearing because it's grounded in basic criminal logic. Border Patrol officer Leon Boyer told the New York Post that if Guthrie had been taken south of the border, cartels would be unlikely to be involved, saying, '[Cartels] are going to target people in Mexico. They're not targeting people in the US. Why would they bring attention to themselves.' Boyer also framed cartel kidnappings as tied to business and extortion, not random headline-grabbing abductions.​

Nothing about Nancy Guthrie's location has been confirmed publicly, and no cartel link has been substantiated by investigators. What is confirmed is that the search is still active, the motive is still unclear, and the loudest theories are arriving from outside the official case file.

Source: International Business Times UK