Scott Bessent Spars with CNN’s Bash Over Tariff Refund: That‘s Bad Framing Because SCOTUS Didn‘t Address That

RUSH EXCERPT:BESSENT: “Well Dana that‘s not the big question. The let‘s just level set here what the Supreme Court did was a very narrow reading of the president‘s authority under the tariffs we have other tariff authorities which have been functioning section 232 tariff. Section 301 tariffs and Dana, when you say it‘s a big question, that‘s bad framing because the Supreme Court didn‘t even address that. The Supreme Court remanded it down to a lower court. And we will follow what they say but that that could be weeks or months when we hear them. So the Supreme Court did not address refunds.”

FindClipsBankNewsBaseRadioBankPodBankTranscriptBankPhotoBankPrintBankClipLiveClipperNewsClipperTVClipperWebClipperRadioClipperPodClipperGifCreatorNewsMonitorCityMonitorShareUploadGifsGalleryLiveShareShowCasterAboutNewsHow-ToRSSLoginRegisterNewsListsClips

Scott Bessent Spars with CNN’s Bash Over Tariff Refund: That‘s Bad Framing Because SCOTUS Didn‘t Address That‘The Supreme Court remanded it down to a lower court’News & PoliticsRUSH EXCERPT:BESSENT: “Well Dana that‘s not the big question. The let‘s just level set here what the Supreme Court did was a very narrow reading of the president‘s authority under the tariffs we have other tariff authorities which have been functioning section 232 tariff. Section 301 tariffs and Dana, when you say it‘s a big question, that‘s bad framing because the Supreme Court didn‘t even address that. The Supreme Court remanded it down to a lower court. And we will follow what they say but that that could be weeks or months when we hear them. So the Supreme Court did not address refunds.”Video filesFullCompactSort byDateSummaryRelevancePopularityPer page81216Audio filesFullCompactSort byDateSummaryRelevancePopularityPer page81216Recipient e-mailMessage (optional)Preview

Source: Grabien Stories