The tide is turning, and a more nuanced discussion around vaccines is now being had by some of the most renowned scientists & medical experts in the field.
Below is a an article written by Dr. Bernard Massie, retired, Professor of Microbiology and Immunology at the Université de Montréal, Managing Director at National Research Council Canada. It was originally published in French on November 26, 2024 inLibre Médiabut remains relevant today. For more information on Dr. Massie, you can accessthisPDF obtained from theCanadian Covid Care Alliance.
TRUTH LIVES on athttps://sgtreport.tv/
I am sure many of our readers are interested in what Dr. Massie had to say.
Is criticism of vaccines taboo? While the establishment labels their detractors “vaccine skeptics” or “antivaxers”, voices like RFK Jr defend the right to question without being ostracized. Science is all about debate.
According to many media commentators, true experts in ScienceTM, vaccine hesitancy is equivalent to the posture that earns you the label of “cuckoo” or “antivax” shamelessly attributed to Robert Kennedy Junior (RFK Jr) and all the scientists in his Children’s Health Defense (CHD) organization.
Mirroring the watered-down label of “climate skeptic” attributed to scientists who criticize climate alarmism, critics of vaccination are also referred to as “vaccine skeptics.”
RFK Jr and his organization are denigrated by the scientific and institutional establishment, as evidenced by aneditorialpublished last August in the prestigious journal Science. It states that RFK Jr. fully deserves his anti-vax label, as do all those who join him in questioning vaccines.
As if questioning were inherently unscientific, and his detractors had the orthodoxy of ScienceTM on their side like dogma!
The premise of this widely-held opinion is the belief that public health institutions are competent and honest, and that they are immune to any influence from marketing or biopharmaceutical firms. Are they really?
Source: SGT Report
