It’s a question that sadly seems to answer itself: Why is Minnesota’s first openly transgender state lawmaker so concerned that kids can access pornography as sex education?
And why is he doubly concerned about itbeing “queer” pornography?
Such are the questions being asked about state Rep. Leigh Finke (a Democrat, in case you even had to ask) went viral for his concerns about an age verification law which would require sites that host adult content to check ID.
He noted that attorneys general in many states “are very clear about — they’re almost jubilant about — being able to use these laws to ban young people from accessing content that could be educational, if they are queer,” Finke said on Thursday.
Speaking to a principal, he also said thatstudentsin that school “are not receiving sex education for queer kids.”
“We know that, for many people, prurient interest could be the very existence of transgender kids,” Finke added. “More and more people are saying there are no transgender kids.”
🚨 WATCH: Minnesota Republicans proposed age verification for websites that host adult content.
Rep. Leigh Finke (D) argues that queer kids should have access to it for educational purposes.
— Dustin Grage (@GrageDustin)February 20, 2026
Aside from the “prurient interest” part of this clip, I’m sort of wondering what the problem is here.
Source: VidNews » Feed
