While a majority of the 75 million Americans who voted forDonald Trumpin 2024 may be attributed to America First positions espoused during the campaign or in the belief that as a Peace President,Trump promised no new interventionist wars.
There might also be the assumption that Trump would abolish neo-con globalist domination or be a stalwart supporter of the US Constitution or that as President, he would address stability of the US Dollar as it relates to the decline of US global hegemony.
To read this article in the following languages, click theTranslate Websitebutton below the author’s name.
Farsi, Español, Русский, 中文,Portugues,Français, عربي, Hebrew, Deutsch, Italiano, 日本語,한국어, Türkçe, Српски. And 40 more languages.
There was, however, no expectation that foreign policy would become significant elements in the Trump administration as he became a co-belligerent in theGaza Genocideat a cost of $21.8 Billionin addition to itsannual ‘gift’of $3.8 billion or the indiscriminate bombing of fishing boats in Venezuela or theunprecedented bombingof seven nations or thekidnappingofVenezuelan President Nicolas Maduroand his wife.
Almost immediately after Inauguration in January, the American public began to witness President Trump as a gratuitous acolyte for Israel’sdesignated war criminalin his quest for aGreater Israelthroughout the Middle East.
The President’stotalitarian agenda surfaced in a series ofinexplicablepolicies that either challenged theFirst Amendmentor are contrary to Trump’s previous policy commitments (read ICE) thus undermining the USas a Constitutional Republic.
Most recently Trump’s renewed his threat to initiate war against Iran by activating the US deployed fleet including two aircraft carrier strike groups building a formidable US naval armada surrounding Iran in the Persian Gulf, the Red Sea and the Mediterranean.
Of special note is a Presidential strategy of issuing threats; thereby forcing consideration of stringent negotiations in the expectation that the threat will be ultimately adopted as a ‘deal’ orwarn Iranof the consequences of not making a deal.In addition, the US is being represented in negotiations by two real estate agents rather than professional, experienced diplomats may be indicative of the lack of solemn consideration regarding any negotiation.
The President’s ad nauseum opposition that Iran cannever havea nuclear weapon may bring negotiators to the table until a red line of resistance approaches as Trump delivers demands to Iran that originated with Netanyahu.
Source: Global Research
