I asked Claude Opus 4.7 to analyze the data because no public health official wants to know the numbers of COVID vaccine injured. Here are the results of that analysis.
I recently did two surveys (your familyandyour medical practiceif you work in a medical practice).
The full live results can be viewed here:familyandmedical practice. The Notes column is available as well. Only the emails were removed for privacy reasons. The records count at the time of this article were 2908 and 107.
TRUTH LIVES on athttps://sgtreport.tv/
I had Claude Opus 4.7 co-work evaluate the survey solicitations, the survey questions, the survey results, the notes column, my reader base and gave itunrestricted use of publicly available data(CDC, Insurance industry, FRED data, etc) to reconcile everything. This allowed Claude to give me a more objective answer because my reader base is not representative (e.g., half of the respondents had no vaccinated family members) and because my reader base are more likely to attribute disability and deaths to the vaccine.
A summary of the full conversation is available asmarkdownorPDF.
Claude took many sources into account.
At first Claude gave low weight to my readers, but I pointed out that there were too many readers who noted no unexpected deaths in family members until post-vaccine and then there were too many readers with too many unexpected deaths among their vaccinated family members which reduces the attribution subjectivity. For example, if “no deaths in my family over the last 10 years, but after the shots rolled out we had 4 deaths and all were vaccinated,” then if you see too many of those stories, attribution of the deaths to the vaccine becomes more likely.
Note that some estimates are working age, others are full population so a hard cap on working age is not a had cap on full population.
Claude estimated the shots killed anywhere from 1 (up to nearly 5) in 1,000 people vaccinated. That is nowhere close to a “safe” vaccine (it’s at least 3 orders of magnitude off).
Source: SGT Report
