We’ve been told the Derek Chauvin case was simple.
We were told the whole thing is a settled fact.
We were told that Derek Chauvin “murdered” George Floyd. The trial proved it, the jury got it right, and anyone who questioned the official storyline was called a bad person or a right-wing “racist” radical.
Because actual facts have a funny way of outliving the hysteria and emotion.
TRUTH LIVES on athttps://sgtreport.tv/
When you take away all the hyper emotions, media pressure, riots, politics, and the worldwide frenzy that surrounded this case, the record looks a lot more layered and complicated than the public was told.
It’s time to look at the actual evidence and ask a very basic question: did Derek Chauvin ever have a chance at a fair trial?
Because when you start looking at the medical examiner’s findings, the disputed testimony, police training materials, and what officials were saying and doing behind the scenes, the so-called “open-and-shut murder case” starts looking a lot less open-and-shut.
And one of the most powerful pieces of evidence comes from an interagency letter sent by the Hennepin County Attorney’s Office to the U.S. Attorney’s Office back in August 2020.
Dr. Andrew Baker told federal prosecutors that he ruled out anything that happened while Floyd was on the ground as a factor or cause in Floyd’s death.
Source: SGT Report
