As the legal sector expands its use of artificial intelligence (AI), many expect that AI-driven systems could help ease crowded dockets and allow judges to turn their attention to cases that demand greater human discernment.
However, while the technology is embraced as a way to ease the judiciary’s burden, experts caution that firm boundaries and clear guidelines will be essential to guard against ethical risks.
Legal experts say the Supreme Court’s administrative arm has quietly rolled out its own artificial intelligence platform, a move intended to streamline legal research and trial management as the nation’s judiciary moves toward a digital future. The system, developed by the National Court Administration, is now undergoing an evaluation of a pilot program.
The system draws on a deep reservoir of court records, including every ruling issued since 2013, to provide judges with more efficient access to case law. Eschewing public AI services, the National Court Administration opted for a proprietary framework to ensure that trial-related work remains contained within the judiciary’s own secure network.
This approach is intended to ensure the security and independence of judicial data, while allowing the courts to gradually refine customized AI models tailored to the specific needs of judicial work.
The courts plan to enhance the accuracy of the first-phase system currently under operation while advancing a second-phase project — targeted for development as early as this year — to analyze and organize case records filed with the courts.
The next-stage system will review documents such as complaints, preparatory briefs and responses, summarizing key points and legal issues.
In later phases, the AI is expected to help judges check draft rulings for logical errors or awkward phrasing and assist with administrative tasks such as locating addresses for document delivery.
The Supreme Court building in Seocho District, Seoul, Thursday / Yonhap
Experts say AI could reshape courtroom proceedings and enable judges to concentrate on cases requiring deeper expertise. But they also emphasize the need for clear guardrails, warning against an overreliance on systems that can carry unseen risks.
Source: Korea Times News
