“The FBI warns that “paranoid views regarding AI” and “attempts to reason the belief that a godlike incarnation of AI is imminent,” are viewed as “anti-tech extremism” and “neo-Luddites.”

Protesting datacenters and other AI devices might get you considered a “domestic terrorist” and a form of “ant-tech extremism” by the Trump administration, according to internal documents from the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and Federal Bureau of Investigations (FBI) recently obtained byWIRED.

TRUTH LIVES on athttps://sgtreport.tv/

The WinePress recently detailed theWhite House’s new Counterterrorism Strategy report— which has flown under the radar — which is built heavily on Trump’s National Security Presidential Memorandum 7(NSPM-7), otherwise known as “Countering Domestic Terrorism and Organized Political Violence,” signed last September not long after Charlie Kirk’s assassination.

These documents, when dissected in their totality, reveal that most if not all Americans are now potentially viewed as domestic terrorist threats.

Both directives list strong implicit references to national databasing and pre-crime surveillance technology in order to deal with these ‘threats.’

The Trump administration defined a terrorist as “Narcoterrorists and Transnational Gangs; Legacy Islamist Terrorists; Violent Left-Wing Extremists, including Anarchists and Anti-Fascists.” In combination with NSPM-7, a “Left-Wing Extremist” really refers to anything the federal government determines is “anti-Americanism, anti-capitalism, and anti-Christianity; support for the overthrow of the United States Government; extremism on migration, race, and gender; and hostility towards those who hold traditional American views on family, religion, and morality.’”

Thus, it can be surmised and concluded that anyone that does not agree with the current administration’s ambitions and ideologies (and any further administration to come after) could be seen as a domestic terrorist.

Following the publication of the new strategy, White House counterterrorism official Sebastian Gorka, one of the authors of the recent CT report, presented an expanded definition as to what a so-called domestic terrorist would look like, referencing figures on the right such as Tucker Carlson and Nick Fuentes. He also reaffirmed the use of pre-crime surveillance technologies to “map” these targeted groups and individuals.

However, WIRED revealed that there is yet another definition to what it means to be potentially branded as a domestic terrorist: opposing datacenters and AI infrastructure.

Source: SGT Report