Last weekend’ssurprise callbetweenPresidents Emmanuel Macron and Alexander Lukashenkofollowed Deputy Chair of the Russian Security CouncilDmitry Medvedevwarningabout the 1941-like threat posed by Germany’s remilitarization and the UK assembling amultinational navyto contain Russia.
These three developments collectively draw attention to how the Brits, French, and Germans, Russia’s traditional European rivals, are now right on its doorstep. The security implications are profound.
To read this article in the following languages, click theTranslate Websitebutton below the author’s name.
Русский, Français, Deutsch, 日本語, Filipino, Italiano, Español, عربي, Hebrew, 中文, Dutch, Farsi, Portugues,한국어, Türkçe. And 40 more languages.
The Brits arenestling up in Estonia, from where they plan to lead Russia’s containment along theArctic -Baltic front, while the Germans opened abase in Lithuaniaand the French just announcedregular nuclear drillswith Poland. As a reminder, Estonia borders “mainland Russia” while Lithuania and Poland border its exclave of Kaliningrad and mutual defense ally Belarus. The “military Schengen” between the Netherlands, Germany, and Poland might thus soon be expanded to includeFranceand theBaltic States.
That would maximally optimize the flow of troops and equipment from Western Europe to Russia’s borders, thus conforming with Russian policymakers’ fears that the EU is gearing up fora potential invasionof their country sometime in the future. Given France’sbase in Romaniaandmilitary pactwith neighboring Moldova, which constitute acriticalflankin theUkrainian Conflictdue to enabling France toaid Odessain the scenario of itsthreatened conventional intervention, they and others might join too.
To make matters even more concerning from the perspective of Russia’s national security interests, Germany recently clinched adeep-strike defense co-production dealwith Ukraine, thus expanding its military footprint even deeper within what Russia considers to be its “sphere of influence”. The result is that the UK is entrenching its influence along the Arctic-Baltic front, Germany is doing so in the Baltic (Lithuanian) and Ukrainian ones, while France is already entrenched in Poland, Romania, and Moldova.
Germanyaspiresto build European NATO’s largest army, which would require overtaking Poland and ideally from its perspective subordinating that country as a vassal, while France and the UK are nuclear powers. The threat posed by their military-strategic convergence right on Russia’s doorstep therefore cannot be overestimated. At the very least, it could embolden their partners to behave aggressively against Russia, calculating as they might that those Great Powers would deter Russian retaliation.
That would be a mistake of epic proportions because Russia cannot allow such a scenario to unfold, let alone become the “new normal”, as it would amount to them weaponizing it for coercing never-ending concessions that would culminate in time with Russia’s subordination and ultimately “Balkanization”. In other words, a hot NATO-Russian war would likely be inevitable, though nobody can say for sure whether the US would help its European allies, nor to what extent if so, or whether it would hang them out to dry.
It’s therefore more urgent than ever that the European security architecture be reformed like Russia sought to do through diplomatic means before thespecialoperation, the failure of which was why Putin sought to advance this through military ones instead. There are really only three scenarios left: NATO finally agrees to some form of Russia’s proposals; Russia launches apreventive war against European NATObetting that the US won’t directly intervene; or Russia peacefully subordinates itself to the West.
Source: Global Research