The following information is based on a report originally published byA Midwestern Doctor. Key details have been streamlined and editorialized for clarity and impact.Read the original report here.
In 1982, an NBC affiliate station in Washington, D.C., produced a documentary called “DPT: Vaccine Roulette.”It got such a huge reaction, the station re-aired it twice. The big NBC promoted it. It even won an Emmy.All because it asked one vital question: Is the DPT vaccine more dangerous than the disease itself?44 years later, a film like this would never win an Emmy, never be funded by mainstream television, nor receive positive media coverage. You can’t even watch the film on YouTube anymore.The question we have to ask is: why?Did the evidence change… or something else?
There was a time when vaccine injury wasn’t treated as a forbidden topic.
NBC, CBS, ABC, CNN, Fox, CNBC, local stations, talk shows, and even European broadcasters aired lengthy segments about paralyzed children, neurological injury, conflicts of interest, hot lots, mandates, regulatory failure, and more.
Most people forgot about it or don’t even know that used to be the norm.
Today, a single skeptical segment about vaccine safety can be framed as reckless and even deadly misinformation.
But for decades, mainstream TV interviewed injured families, challenged officials, and aired data the agencies did not want discussed.
This information comes from the work of medical researcherA Midwestern Doctor. For all the sources and details, read thefull reportbelow.
This doesn’t mean every vaccine claim is settled or that no vaccine can ever have a role in public health.
A society cannot evaluate riskhonestlyif one side of the risk ledger literally disappears from public view and from memory.
Source: The Vigilant Fox
