The statute of limitations for the criminal referral on Dr. Anthony Fauci lying to Congress about funding the Wuhan Institute will expire this week unless the Department of Justice indicts him. Meanwhile, the Senate Homeland Security & Governmental Affairs Committee, chaired by Senator Rand Paul (R-KY) will hold a hearing on the National Institute of Allergy & Infectious Diseases (NIAID) allegedly funding the Wuhan Institute. David Morens, Dr. Fauci’s top advisor, has been indicted for covering up the NIAID’s role.
Of course, Dr. Fauci was given a last-minute pardon by the Biden Administration, although the validity of the pardon (i.e. autopen) is in question.
Dr. Fauci became Director of NIAID in 1984. And during the Covid-19 Pandemic, he took the bull by the horns and became Big Brother (the villain from George Orwell’s novel Nineteen Eighty-Four). He advocated social distancing and lockdowns. Criticism of him and his policies were labelled futile, and apparently even the equivalent of blasphemy. In fact, Dr. Fauci claimed he represented and even identified with science (i.e. saying “I am science”). He also said that attacks on him were attacks on science.
Perhaps Dr. Fauci wants to be canonized.
It should be noted that scientists have been given a free pass in regards to being criticized or even questioned, whether it be by other scientists or journalists. And the scientific community likes it to be that way, although experts within a certain field are allowed to question each other. But when it comes to the medical field, journalists are reluctant to question the experts, and risk having their stories killed if they do. For instance, senior officials from the National Institutes of Health (NIH) have contacted television producers and told them that certain views being publicized could endanger public health. Thus, the media caves in, thinking it is unsafe to question the experts, when in fact it is unsafe not to do so.
It should also be noted that NIAID is under the NIH. which in turn is regarded by some as a white-coated priesthood funded by our tax dollars. In fact, the NIH’s budget has increased over the years.
Thus, our tax dollars have been allegedly been used by a government agency to fund another government agency (the NIAID) from a communist regime (the Wuhan Institute)- hence the expression “follow the money.”
So why was the NIAID funding the Wuhan Institute? And wouldn’t doing so be considered treason?
It’s unclear if the Department of Justice will indict Dr. Fauci. But whether or not they do will not prevent the truth from being revealed.
Source: Clash Daily
