For years, corporate media has been peddling the IPCC’s RCP8.5-fuelled terror – now that there has been a massive course correction, a semi-retraction of it, silence.
RCP8.5 is a high-emissions climate scenario used in theIPCC Fifth Assessment Report(“AR5”) published in 2014 to model future climate change. In April this year, the hammer was dropped on this doomsday scenario and declared “implausible.”
Although corporate media have publicised the IPCC’s implausible scenario for years, when it is corrected, they ignore it. The reason for the media blackout is not hard to fathom. “These outlets built empires on existential dread. Admitting the favourite scare tool was nonsense risks exposing the hype machine,” Stephen Heins writes.
TRUTH LIVES on athttps://sgtreport.tv/
On Wednesday,we published an articleby Robert Bradley Jr. in which he discussed the failure of the United Nations’ Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (“IPCC”) to come to an agreement, which is causing a delay in the release of its Seventh Assessment Report (“AR7”).
Bradley highlighted aLinkedIn postmade by Slovak climate propagandist Jozef Pecho in which he lamented the IPCC’s failure to meet deadlines because it jeopardised the work his entire field does, that is: to advise governments how to follow the UN’s mandates on climate change and hold governments that do not obey accountable.
Bradley noted some comments left under Pecho’s post by other LinkedIn users. One called out the base case RCP8.5 being “so far away from reality that people just stopped talking about it and moved on because it was an embarrassment.”
Most of us haven’t heard of “RCP8.5.” Stephen Heins’ article below explains what it is and why it proved so controversial, and why it is key to the entire false catastrophic climate change narrative.
Source: SGT Report
