For centuries, the windswept sands of the Giza Plateau have guarded some of the world’s greatest mysteries.
Towering pyramids, hidden tombs, and the legendary Great Sphinx of Giza continues to inspire wonder among archaeologists and travelers alike.
TheDaily Mailreported that a new potential discovery recently discussed on the “Matt Beall Limitless” podcast has reignited global fascination with this ancient site.
The potential discovery centers on work led by Italian radar specialistFilippo Biondi, who used satellite radar imaging and synthetic aperture radar technology to scan sections of the plateau for subtle ground vibrations. According to Biondi, the scans revealed unusual underground formations beneath a mound of hardened sand close to the existing Sphinx.
“Down underneath the Giza Plateau, there is something very huge that we are measuring… There is an underground megastructure,” Biondi said.
Researchers believe the buried structure could be enormous, possibly measuring more than 100 feet tall. They also reported detecting vertical shafts and horizontal passageways beneath the site, features they say resemble structures associated with the known Sphinx.
The “Dream Stele,” also known as the Sphinx Stele, is an ancient stone monument placed between the paws of the Great Sphinx during the reign of Pharaoh Thutmose IV around 1401 BC. Some interpretations of the carvings appear to show two sphinxes rather than one, which could hint at prior knowledge of a twin monument having existed at Giza.
Biondi and his collaborators also pointed to geometric alignments across the plateau. They explained that when they drew a line from the center of the Khafre Pyramid to the existing Sphinx, it created a precise geometric path across the plateau, forming what Biondi described as a mirrored reference line to identify the second location.
When that same alignment was mirrored from the center of the Great Pyramid, it pointed to the exact spot where the scans now suggest a second Sphinx may be buried under a mound of hardened sand.
They argue that the symmetry is too precise to be accidental.
Source: VidNews » Feed
