by Brenda Baletti, Ph.D.,Childrens Health Defense:
Existing epidemiological studies — studies on how often diseases occur in different groups of people and why — are designed to examine whether vaccines cause neurodevelopmental injuries in the general childhood population. But these studies can’t capture the effects of vaccines on subgroups — like children with mitochondrial dysfunction who may be more vulnerable to injuries from vaccines, according to a preprint by Children’s Health Defense scientists and their colleagues.
TRUTH LIVES on athttps://sgtreport.tv/
The long-running debate over whether vaccines causeautismreflects an “epistemic crisis” in medical science — not a dispute over scientific facts, according to anew preprintbyChildren’s Health Defensescientists and their colleagues.
Existingepidemiological studies— studies on how often diseases occur in different groups of people and why — are designed to examine whethervaccinescause neurodevelopmental injuries in the general childhood population.
These studies can’t capture the effects of vaccines on subgroups — like children withmitochondrial dysfunctionwho may be more vulnerable to injuries from vaccines.
Typically, these studies don’t examine any of the biological markers — mitochondrial function, oxidative stress and immune system dysregulation — through which vaccines might cause harm.
The failure to recognize this possible connection points to a deeper structural problem in vaccine research, which routinely uses findings from epidemiological studies to settle questions those studies were never designed to answer.
Mitochondrial vulnerability, inherited and detectable at birth, means affected children may respond differently toenvironmental triggers, including vaccines. It also means vaccines may not pose the same risk for all children.
Co-author Karl Jablonowski, Ph.D., summarized the findings:
Source: SGT Report
