U.S. President Donald Trump charged into this destructive crusade without a word to Congress, without a clear rationale for why he was doing it and, now, with a spiraling price tag for the American taxpayers.
No, we’re not referring to Trump’s ill-conceived war in Iran — though the description works pretty well there, too. We’re referring to his monstrosity of a planned White House ballroom, which is on track to devolve from a $200 million privately funded vanity project to a $400 million publicly funded security project.
As Missourians grit their teeth at astronomical fuel prices thanks to Trump’s unauthorized assault on Iran, they should ask why their junior U.S. senator, Eric Schmitt, is now trying to stick them with the bill for this unauthorized assault on the history and dignity of the White House.
The “security” part stems from last month’s assassination attempt as Trump attended the annual White House Correspondents’ Dinner at the Washington Hilton.
In the years Trump has talked about wanting a “big beautiful ballroom” added to the White House, his focus has generally been about the alleged grandeur it would bring to an institution that, in his gold-leaf worldview, was apparently not grand enough already.
But as with his shifting rationales for the war in Iran — halting nuclear proliferation, stemming terrorism, prompting regime change, reopening oil markets, or whatever it is this week — he has now shifted the rationale for the ballroom to security.
“This event would never have happened with the Militarily Top Secret Ballroom currently under construction at the White House,” Trump wrote on his Truth Social platform the day after the attempted assassination. “It cannot be built fast enough!”
While no serious person argues against the need for iron-clad presidential security, further ensconcing the presidency away from public appearances raises its own issues. And they're not the only issues at play here.
Trump ordered the East Wing torn down and ballroom work started without any congressional approval, any deference to architectural or historical integrity nor any real public discussion. Which is why the project is currently being challenged in court.
And while Trump’s initial vow that it would be fully funded by donations was in itself problematic — no president in modern times has more shamelessly leveraged his office for personal gain than this one — suddenly attempting to foist a newly inflated price tag for an unauthorized project onto the public is worse.
Source: Korea Times News
