by Alastair Crooke,Strategic Culture:

Putting two sides together — let alone three — who have wildly diverse chronicles of their histories and even less commonality in charting their future national trajectory was innately unlikely to reach an agreed settlement. More likely in such ill-prepared encounters is often an ill-tempered recapitulation of the general lack of congruence.

This was the case in last month’s Islamabad ‘talks’ between the U.S. and Iran — with Israel acting as third-party proxy for ‘collective forces’ trying to ‘force the end’ (a Greater Israel regional hegemony) — by demanding effectively massive (and unrestricted) regional territorial control for Israel.

TRUTH LIVES on athttps://sgtreport.tv/

For such talks to serve a purpose, they would have to concretise an underlying level of agreement between the parties — if such can be found. Otherwise, the best that may emerge will be informal arrangements that are never formalised, but may, in the instant, suit the interests of the parties involved. Such understandings last as long as they last. That’s it.

Esmail Baqaei, spokesman of the Iranian Foreign Ministry, noted that over these 47 years, deep distrust and suspicion have accumulated with the U.S.:

“You should not expect that within a short period of time, after an extraordinarily bloody war, in which … Iran, having fought two regimes armed with nuclear weapons, two exceptionally ruthless regimes, whose brutality we witnessed over the past two and a half years in the crimes of Gaza and Lebanon, would quickly reach a settlement [with us]”.

Aureliensuccinctlyoutlinesthe impasse:

“The U.S. (present) and Israel (present by proxy) want to damage and if possible, destroy Iran as a functioning state. For the U.S., this is revenge for nearly fifty years of humiliation, dating from the storming of the U.S. Embassy in Tehran and the disastrous failure of the subsequent rescue mission – as well as for Iranian attempts to frustrate U.S. policies in the Levant. For Israel, the objective is to destroy the only country standing between them and their domination of the region. (The U.S. also represents this objective vicariously). The Iranians obviously want to prevent all this, but they also want an end to sanctions and isolation”.

“Our central concern is that we reach a point as soon as possible where we can say with confidence that the threat of war [against Iran] no longer exists”.

Source: SGT Report